The Method

How a pick gets on the board, what Edge Gap actually measures, and the situations where we refuse to publish anything at all.

Edge Gap

Hit rate on its own is useless, because the market has already priced it. A prop hitting 100% of its last ten at −6000 is worth nothing. What matters is the distance between a player's weighted history and the price being offered.

Blended hit rate = 40% season + 30% last 20 + 20% last 10 + 10% last 5
Edge Gap = Blended hit rate − Implied probability

Edge Gap ranks. It does not predict. A +27.7 gap is not a 27.7% profit and not an 82% chance of winning tonight. Those historical rates came from a different distribution of lines than the one on the board today. Our real graded hit rate is 57%, and that is the only number that describes what actually happens.

Anything above +40 we treat as a broken line rather than value, and either verify it or exclude it.

The matchup layer

Edge Gap ranks; the matchup gates. Each leg gets a verdict of Confirms, Neutral or Conflicts, and a Conflicts drops the leg no matter how large the gap.

When a pick conflicts we check whether the opposite side, or a combination version of the same player, confirms instead. A real case: Lauren Betts Under 6.5 Points was dropped because Las Vegas is worst in the league against centres — and that same fact made her Over 9.5 Points+Rebounds+Assists one of the best legs on the board.

When we don't publish

What we get wrong

Raw implied probability includes the bookmaker's margin, blended hit rate over-weights players in form, and small samples are a constant trap — batter-versus-pitcher under 30 plate appearances gets ignored entirely. Every card ends with the strongest argument we can make against our own top pick. That section is not optional.